My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2009 06 15 APPROVED
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION
>
2005-2019 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
2009 Historic Preservation Commission Agendas and Packets
>
Historic Preservation Commission Minutes 2009 06 15 APPROVED
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 3:08:23 PM
Creation date
7/19/2010 10:42:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
HPCMIN 2009 06 15 APPROVED
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Historic Preservation Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />June 15, 2009 <br />Page 4 of 8 <br /> <br />Koertje stated his interest in Senor T’s. He requested that each request be <br />placed on the next agenda. <br /> <br />Tofte stated that 4 weeks is a long time to wait for an answer. <br /> <br />Lewis stated that just because a structure is on the market doesn’t mean it is in <br />peril. <br /> <br />Stewart asked how much of the fund balance is avaialble for acquisition. <br /> <br />Koertje stated the fund has not been broken down into individual elements. <br /> <br />Stewart stated he would recommend the grain elevator as the first acquisition. <br />He stated it is not being used nor is it on the market. <br /> <br />Tofte asked if the Commission could move forward on acquiring something that <br />isn’t currently on the market. <br /> <br />Stewart asked why not. <br /> <br />Tofet asked how should the Commission allocate funds. <br /> <br />Koertje stated the Commission will create a budget at the beginning of each year. <br /> <br />Koertje closed by asking Staff to bring back the grant application at the next <br />meeting for Commission review. <br /> <br />Update/Discussion/Action – Downtown Design Guidelines and Old Town <br />Overlay Regulations <br /> <br />Koertje stated Whiteman and Koertje had asked City Council to appoint a body to <br />review what elements of the downtown design standards should be reviewed. <br />Koertje stated that Council recommended that the HPC and Planning <br />Commission chose two representatives from each Commission to go through the <br />guidelines to determine what elements need to be addressed, primarily how to <br />address the preservation of character. <br /> <br />McCartney then polled the Commission to ask who would be interested in <br />participating. <br /> <br />Stewart and Williams volunteered to be on the review committee. <br /> <br />Tofte stated the Committee could contact Greg McMenamin to inquire about the <br />establishment of an architectural review board. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.