My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Study Session Summary 2002 04 09
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
STUDY SESSIONS (45.010)
>
2001-2009 City Council Study Sessions
>
2002 City Council Study Sessions
>
City Council Study Session Summary 2002 04 09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/6/2019 11:22:42 AM
Creation date
9/15/2010 9:38:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITYWIDE
Supplemental fields
Test
SSSUM 2002 04 09
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Steve explained that the Town of Superior is prepared to proceed into the 1601 process, which is the <br />CDOT process necessary to obtain approval for modification to a state highway facility. He outlined <br />the steps and timeline for the 1601 process as follows: <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Step 1 (4-7 months) system-level study, requires updating volumes to DRCOG <br />2025 analysis & report presented to transportation commission <br />for approval <br /> <br />once step one approval is obtained, the remaining steps must be completed within 3 years <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Step 2 (10-12 months) project-level feasibility study, identify costs, problems, how to <br />construct <br /> <br />done in tandem with: <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Step 3 environmental study <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Step 4 (8-12 months) design <br /> <br />He explained that, in a best-case scenario, it would be possible to be breaking ground in 2 ½ - 3 <br />years. The construction would take one construction season. <br /> <br />There was discussion regarding whether or not the current bridge would be large enough to <br />accommodate the traffic levels and whether or not the options could accommodate the <br />improvements outlines in the MIS and specifically the BRT component; meeting with the Superior <br />Town Board to confirm financing and/or a memorandum of understanding regarding financing; and <br />talking to business owners along US 36 regarding the plan and other options. <br /> <br />Discussion/Direction – Police Department Building <br />Bill Simmons outlined the project to date, and presented Council with two building options: <br /> Option A two-story, shell space for courts & dispatch @$3,045,520 <br /> Option B single-story, no shell space for courts & dispatch @$2,757,200 <br />Both options exceed the $2,100,000 budgeted for the project. <br /> <br />Herb Roth, Roth/Shepherd Architects, explained that based upon a needs assessment conducted for <br />the Police Department, projections for twenty years of growth show the need for a 16,000 sf <br />building. He went on to state that the City of Louisville could not afford to construct a police <br />building of that size; therefore, the building was reduced to 12,000 sf. The cost estimates for each <br />option are based upon a nation average of $175/sf to construct police buildings. <br /> <br />Council reviewed the space summary by activity, asking for clarification on the need for a briefing <br />room in addition to a training room, and questioning the space requirement for a copier/mail room. <br />There was also discussion regarding whether or not to consider finishing the court space. <br /> <br /> 2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.