My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2010 08 19
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2010 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2010 08 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:30:11 AM
Creation date
9/29/2010 9:22:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCPKT 2010 08 19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Michael Menaker, 1827 Choke Cherry Dr, stated his support for the proposed <br />product types in the development. <br />Commission Questions of Applicant: <br />O'Connell asked what source is used to determine the change from multi - family <br />to single - family. <br />Brew stated their source has been local and national builders they have <br />consulted with over the past 2 years. <br />Brauneis inquired about a HERS rating or energy efficienc .rogram for the <br />home construction. <br />Steve Erickson, with Ryland Homes, stated all hom- •uilt to "Built Green" <br />program standards. <br />Brauneis asked if a portion of the site is locat- the flood <br />Brew state a CLOMR was approved and <br />construction completion. <br />Brauneis stated his concern with the elimin <br />product. <br />Brew stated the Stapleton devel <br />the front load is selling. <br />Brauneis asked if the 2 ' ® -rage fro <br />enough difference s• • • •romd <br />line. <br />McCartney con i <br />the 5' difference wi <br />frontage <br />Staff <br />No <br />Public <br />O'Conne <br />disappoint <br />that type of uri <br />of the applicant. <br />drag <br />Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 8, 2010 <br />Page 5 of 8 <br />R will be requires time of <br />alley loaded home <br />of the alley loaded while <br />ouse setback is <br />of g. • -s along the front property <br />garding the setbacks. He confirmed <br />ugh so as to not have a street <br />and Recommendation: <br />mis on Comments: <br />rt of the project requested changes. She stated her <br />of the higher density units because of the demand for <br />r County. She also understands the financial concerns <br />Loo stated her support of the project changes and how those changes will serve <br />the needs of the seniors in Louisville with the proposed product types. <br />Lipton stated he is pleased the number of products being made available to <br />varied income levels. Louisville does not need more big houses. He also stated <br />the front versus alley loaded garages is not a concern for him. He supports the <br />requested changes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.