My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2010 08 19
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
PLANNING COMMISSION
>
2000-2019 Planning Commission
>
2010 Planning Commission Agendas Packets Minutes
>
Planning Commission Agenda and Packet 2010 08 19
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 9:30:11 AM
Creation date
9/29/2010 9:22:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
PCPKT 2010 08 19
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Planning Commission <br />Meeting Minutes <br />July 8, 2010 <br />Page 6 of 8 <br />Pritchard stated he supports the changes and feels they are an improvement to <br />the product type and thus more desirable. <br />Brauneis stated he supports the requested changes and he is pleased the <br />number of units for the site has not changed. He expressed concern with losing <br />the number of multi - family units. He encouraged the developers to discuss their <br />options with other builders to get their point of view. <br />Lipton moved and Loo and Pritchard seconded the motion to approve Resolution <br />No. 15, Series 2010 a resolution recommending approval of revisions to an <br />approved general development plan, final development s <br />planned unit development (PUD) plan, Takoda Village <br />the density swap of 20 residential units from Planni <br />Area 4 with one condition. <br />The applicant shall comply with t <br />2010 memo provided by Crai <br />modifications shall be reflec <br />Council. <br />McCartney requested an additional conditio <br />comply with the conditions state • the July 1, <br />Parks and Recreation Departme - odifica <br />plan sets prior to City Council. <br />Lipton stated his desire • include t <br />also accepted the ad® • •nditio <br />Roll CaII Vote: <br />Discussion — Direction <br />ondition <br />n, Assist <br />h the plan s <br />ision plat and final <br />ivision to allow for <br />2 and 3 to Planning <br />s -d in the July 1, <br />ant ngineer. The <br />ets pri• • City <br />: The applicant shall <br />memo provided by the <br />shall be reflected on the <br />. Loo and Pritchard <br />➢ Special Review Use (SRU) Administrative Review Criteria <br />Russ led the discussion to consider an amendment to the Louisville Municipal <br />Code Section 17.40 to allow for an administrative procedure for Special Review <br />Uses. The discussion included the following: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.