My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Board of Adjustment Documents 1981
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
>
1974-1998 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
1981 Board of Adjustment Agendas and Packets
>
Board of Adjustment Documents 1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:05:03 PM
Creation date
11/21/2006 9:36:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BOADOCS 1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Variance Case <br />Number 1981-1 <br />February 26, 1981 <br /> <br />BOARD OF APPEALS AND BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS MINUTES: PUBLIC HEARING FOR A <br />VARIANCE FROM THE LOUISVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE, THOMAS A. BOVIO, APPLICANT. <br />FEBRUARY 26, 1981. PAGE 3. <br /> <br />7. COMMENTS BY STAFF - CONTINUED: <br /> <br />B. Zoning Department Comments. <br />1. The Zoning Department had no comments. <br />c. Building Department Comments. <br />1. Ferris replies that the distance to the house that would be <br />adjacent to his property is 6.75 feet from the property line, <br />and the worst that this setback would be creating is still 6 <br />feet so there's no building code problems as far as that's <br />concerned. The zoning in that area apparently at ona time <br />was possibly a P.U.D. per se, because the setback on the south <br />side of the property is 4.5 feet, so it wouldn't be creating <br />a worse situation. <br />2. Reed wants to know what the Building Code requires as far as <br />eaves and so forth. <br />a. Ferris replies that he could extend into the side yard <br />3 feet. <br />3. Davies asks Ferris if the distance between structures has been <br />able to, in the past, allow a firetruck to possibly go through <br />there in case of an emergency. Is this correct? <br />a. Ferris replies not in a residential subdivision. If a fire <br />truck would need to get in he would have to go down through <br />the back of the properties, and in this case there's a 7 <br />foot easement towards the back of the house. The Building <br />Code would allow the two buildings to be within 6 feet of <br />each other, and in this case it would be almost 14 feet. <br />The way most of the new subdivisions are laid out now is <br />that there is 10 feet between the structures, or 5 feet <br />between the property line and structure. That wouldn't <br />be wide enough to get a truck through there anyway. He <br />thinks it's just to kind of keep a continuity between the <br />entire subdivision. <br />1. Davies is just trying to reason this thing out, that <br />to his knowledge in this new section of town you have <br />no alleys so it must be a P.U.D. set-up, and if it is, <br />then some houses can be closer than others. <br />b. Ferris says that maybe P.U.D. was the wrong word, since it <br />wasn't even heard of at the time the house was built, so <br />this is kind of an existing non-conforming structure, <br />because the setback on the south side is already in vio- <br />lation of the Louisville Municipal Code. As far as the <br />Building Code and the Zoning Ordinances go, the Staff has <br />no problem with it for Fire Protection. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.