My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1999 04 20
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1999 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1999 04 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:36:44 PM
Creation date
2/3/2004 10:50:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
4/20/1999
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1999 04 20
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Davidson asked for clarification that the Commercial Development Design Standards & <br />Guidelines would require an eight-foot buffer on both sides of a shared access drive. <br /> <br />Wood replied, yes. However, the Outback Restaurant was approved prior to the <br />Commercial Development Design Standards & Guidelines. He explained that the buffer <br />could be extended further to the west. <br /> <br />Davidson questioned whether the request for an exemption from the eight-foot landscape <br />buffer was due to the drive-through facility use. <br /> <br />Wood replied, no. He explained that there's a cross-access easement along the south <br />property line that's encumbered by the plat. He stated that twelve-feet of the access <br />easement is on Lot 6B, and twelve-feet is on the Outback Restaurant lot. He explained <br />that, due to the fact that you cannot place anything inside the access easement along the <br />property line, he did not feel landscape improvements could be installed there. <br /> <br />Davidson stated that it appears that the eight-foot standard contained in the Commercial <br />Development Design Standards & Guidelines is being excused due to the fact that there <br />will be a drive-through facility at this location. <br /> <br />Wood replied that the drive-through requires circulation that wraps around the building. <br />He explained that what impacts this property line is the ten-foot drive aisle next to the <br />bank. He stated that if there were no drive-through at this location, the shared-access <br />easement would still be necessary for joint use between Lot 6B and the Outback <br />Restaurant lot. <br /> <br />Davidson replied that due to the fact that the driveway, which is located south of the <br />current buffer, provides access to both lots, he was uncertain why the eight-foot standard <br />is being excused. He agreed that there were different guidelines in place when the <br />Outback Restaurant was approved; however, the Commercial Development Design <br />Standards & Guidelines apply to this development and they require an eight-foot buffer. <br />He requested that Light read the Commercial Development Design Standards & <br />Guidelines for parking lots. <br /> <br />Light read, 'use Iow, opaque walls and/or flowering plants combined with berming and/or <br />raised planters to create a dense visual buffer of parking areas from peripheral streets or <br />frontages.' He stated that this allows for several different combinations. <br /> <br />Davidson replied that a berm or raised planter would be required along with some <br />landscaping materials; however, this plan provides landscaping material only. <br /> <br />Wood agreed that berming could be required. <br /> <br />Davidson stated that there appear to be two distinct areas where the Commercial <br />Development Design Standards & Guidelines are not being met. He reminded Council <br /> <br />21 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.