City Council Minutes 2003 09 16 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Louisville City Council Meeting September 16, 2003 Page 8 of 11 Light responded no. Davidson asked Light if the zoning were changed, could businesses continue to operate within area, under the amended Comp Plan. Light explained it would depend on what the actual zoning ordinance. He stated the planning document is an advisory document and has several implementation steps. He noted businesses could continue to operate as legal non-conforming uses. Sisk asked City Attorney Light if the City could condemn the property through an urban renewal project. Light stated the City has the power to condemn property for certain purposes. An Urban Renewal Authority has greater power to condemn for purposes of economic development. In order for that to happen, the Authority would have to undertake that specific exercise of power. Davidson and Sisk confirmed the present Council's actions are not in favor of pursuing condemnation. Deborski asked if his submittal could be entered into the record. Davidson confirmed his submittals would be entered into the record. Brown asked if the plan included pedestrian access in the interim. Johnstone stated the plan recommends pedestrian access in the interim and when the railway come through it will be incorporated into the plan. Brown asked how the west side of Front Street is affected. Johnstone stated South Street would be connected to the downtown by an underpass. Brown commented the framework plan has flexibility for residential and retail. He asked Johnstone if the railroad light at Griffith Street would be removed. Johnstone confirmed the light would be moved to Short Street. Sisk expressed his appreciation to Johnstone, the Staff Committee, Council member Brown, Mayor Davidson and the Planning Commission for their involvement in the project. He voiced his excitement with the framework plan to revitalization the area. Keany asked if all the property owners in the area were involved in the planning process. Johnstone reported that all the property owners were in involved in the planning process and have given their support. Keany noted this project might occur very piece meal over the years. Johnstone concurred and stated an earlier plan called for all the properties to come together at one time, however, that plan has been revised to be more respectful of property owners. Keany asked about the public square portion of the plan and asked how the properties would be assembled for public dedication. 8