Laserfiche WebLink
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />September 4, 2001 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />Sisk called for Staff presentation. <br /> <br />Planning Director Paul Wood reviewed that Ordinance No. 1362, Series 2001, is before <br />Council on second reading. He noted that if authorized, the Ordinance would annex a <br />1.156-acre parcel known as the Maurer Annexation. The landowners, James and Kaylyn <br />Maurer have submitted an annexation petition to initiate voluntary annexation of their <br />property located approximately 600 feet east of the intersection of S. 88th Street and <br />Dillon Road. Wood noted that the property is not an enclave and has 59% contiguity with <br />the City of Louisville. Wood noted that the property is undeveloped, triangular in shape, <br />and has 398 feet of linear frontage on the Dillon Road right-of-way. West of the property <br />is the Coal Creek Ranch Outlots E and I, Coal Creek Ranch Subdivision Filing #4. <br /> <br />Wood stated that as a condition of annexation, the applicant requested that the City <br />convey an access easement across Outlot E to provide access to the subject property from <br />St. Andrews Lane. He stated that Resolution No. 24, Series 2001, the resolution of <br />eligibility was approved by City Council on July 17, 2001 in conjunction with the first <br />reading approval of the ordinance. <br /> <br />Wood reviewed that at the July 17 meeting, City Council directed Staff to draft an <br />annexation agreement with a number of special provisions pertaining to access, driveway <br />design and the dedication of a public use trail. The agreement was reviewed by the <br />applicant's counsel and has been forwarded to Council without any requested changes. <br /> <br />Wood stated that the applicants have requested zoning designation of Single-Family <br />Estate (SF-E). Wood stated that the SF-E Zoning District requires a minimum lot area of <br />one acre. The one-acre parcel would allow the applicant enough area to apply for the <br />PUD process, should they seek relief from the SF-E requirements. He noted that the <br />issue was not built into the annexation agreement. The SF-E zoned district provides for <br />15% lot coverage maximum, which would yield 6,500 SF coverage. <br /> <br />Wood reviewed that the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on July 10, <br />2001 and recommended support of the SF-E zoning. Commission Member Kalish voted <br />in opposition, stating that the Planning Commission should not take action until Council <br />takes action on the annexation. Wood noted that the discussion reflected the <br />Commission's overall concern about the suitability of the subject parcel for residential <br />development. The Planning Commission supported the zoning based on it being the most <br />restrictive zoning for the size of the parcel, and that the SF-E zoning was more <br />appropriate than agriculture zoning. <br /> <br />Sisk opened the public heating for Ordinance Nos. 1362 and 1363, Series 2001, and <br />outlined a new procedure, which is provided in the proposed Charter. He explained that <br />Council discussions and comments would be followed by public comments. He asked if <br />Council had any objections to following the procedure that he outlined. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br /> <br />