My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2002 04 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2002 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2002 04 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:41:41 PM
Creation date
11/25/2003 2:33:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
4/2/2002
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B6
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2002 04 02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Louisville City Council Meeting <br />April 2, 2002 <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />Public Works Director Tom Phare reviewed the Louisville Reservoir Rehabilitation <br />Project and explained that. 146 acres was required for completion. The adjacent <br />landowner, the City of Lafayette, has agreed that the value assigned to the property could <br />be deeded to Louisville for past considerations. <br /> <br />COUNCIL COMMENTS <br /> <br />Sisk asked City Attorney Light if he had reviewed the Quit Claim Deed. He commented <br />that there were references of an Exhibit #A, however, he could not locate the exhibit. <br />Light stated that he did review the deed, and would obtain the original deed. He noted <br />that the title company would provide title insurance. <br /> <br />Davidson credited and complimented Public Works Director Phare for the positive <br />outcome of the project. <br /> <br />MOTION: Brown moved that Council approve Resolution No. 12, Series 2002, <br />seconded by Levihn. Roll call vote was taken. The motion passed by a vote of 7-0. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Tom Phare distributed a graph, which depicted the projection of <br />City water supply versus water demand. He also distributed and reviewed a spreadsheet <br />that outlined the water demand by month, using 2001 data. The spreadsheet also outlined <br />the various sources of the water supply. Phare emphasized that with the dry winter; the <br />next six weeks will be critical. He stated the water supply would be monitored and that <br />the Council would be updated on a monthly basis. <br /> <br />Mayer asked Phare about the City's current holdings of CBT water and Windy Gap. <br />Phare stated that the City owns over 1,000 units of CBT water. He projected 100% quota <br />on CBT, which is one acre-foot per unit, and 0% from Windy Gap. <br /> <br />Mayer addressed the Windy Gap Water supply and asked why the projection is so low. <br />Phare stated that in dry years, the Windy Gap water peaks at the runoff season, and is <br />difficult to capture. He noted that Windy Gap water is used more by entities and the <br />City's prorated share is very small. <br /> <br />Mayer stated that Windy Gap is a storage system for CBT water. Phare stated that there <br />has not been a runoff pattern capable of keeping the reservoir full with Windy Gap. He <br />stated the City might get some water out of Windy Gap, but not realize full quota. <br /> <br />Mayer requested the monthly updates be more detailed. <br /> <br />Davidson commented that the City purchased Windy Gap because it was the criteria for <br />joining the Northem Colorado Water District and purchasing Big Thompson water. <br /> <br />CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.