Laserfiche WebLink
<br />mounted racks that are a very clean way to store the bikes. <br /> <br />Commissioner Klahn asked about the user of Building B and why they wanted it to be <br />rectangular. She would like to see some architectural detail on the building. Mr. Seibert stated <br />that they have a very limited building envelope and that they are trying to maximize that as well, <br />and that is another reason why they don’t have a lot of articulation in the building footprint. <br />Klahn would like to see more architectural detail in the future. Klahn also would like to see more <br />perennials on the landscape plan. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lipton is also looking for more architectural interest on the buildings in the Park at <br />CTC. He does not feel that Building B has that at this time and thinks it needs a lot of work <br />before the Final PUD. <br /> <br />Staff Summary: <br /> <br />Kenneth Johnstone stated that Staff is recommending approval of the Preliminary Resolution No. <br />36, Series 1999, comes before the Commission with 11 Conditions, though Condition No. 11 can <br />be removed because it is correctly noted on the lighting plan. Staff is concerned about the access <br />drive in the back and does not feel that making it a one-way would work because there are <br />parking spaces back there. He would like to see it designed based on the buildings and the access <br />drives, not based on signage. <br /> <br />Applicant Summary: <br /> <br />Mr. Gastineau stated that they are willing to work with Staff to meet the Planning Commissioners <br />standards. <br /> <br />Public Hearing Closed / Commission Discussion / Vote: <br /> <br />Commissioner Lipton agrees with Staff regarding the access drive. <br /> <br />Commissioner Klahn will vote for this and would like to see more perennials added as a condition. <br /> <br />Chairman Boulet is in agreement that Building B needs some more architectural interest. <br /> <br />Commissioner Pritchard would also like to see more done to Building B, and something else done <br />with the access drive in the back of the building as Staff suggested. <br /> <br />Commissioner Thompson agrees with comments regarding Building B, and is in favor of the <br />Subdivision Replat. She would like some confirmation that chemicals will not be stored in this <br />building for the Final. <br /> <br />Motion made by Jeff Lipton to approve Resolution No. 36, Series 1999, with the first ten staff <br /> <br /> 8 <br /> <br />