Laserfiche WebLink
<br />plan, and rezoning subject to the seven conditions as outlined on Resolution 3 and with no <br />conditions on Resolution 4 as provided in the hard copy staff report. <br /> <br />Commission Questions: <br />Robson asked Craig Kitzman what the comments were from Boulder County regarding the storm <br />sewer drainage. <br />Kitzman reviewed the design and explained that the Applicant has addressed the issue of the 100- <br />year rainwater. <br /> <br />Lipton asked Kitzman if a sidewalk was planned. <br />Kitzman stated that a sidewalk would be located on only one side of the street. <br /> <br />No other questions from Commissioners. <br /> <br />Applicant Presentation: <br />Mike Burns, 2500 Arapahoe Ave., Suite 220, Boulder, CO, representing CTLC Investors, LLC <br />supports the information provided by Mr. Wood regarding the location of the access point for the <br />Bennett Property, the Public Use Dedication, and the drainage. Burns reported that he <br />appreciated all the time Mr. Kitzman had dedicated to assisting them with the numerous issues. <br />Burns stated that he would address any questions that the Commission has. <br /> <br />Commission Questions: <br />th <br />Susan Loo requested clarification of the development of 104 Street because it is a highly traveled <br />street. <br />Wood and Kitzman provided information and referred to the site plan. <br /> <br />Robson discussed with Kitzman the easement width, questioning why it was not 54’. <br /> <br />Members of the Public: <br />Lipton called for public comment. <br /> <br />Terry O’Connor, 7312 Windsor Dr., Boulder, CO read a letter dated August 2002 and addressed <br />to the Planning Commission and Paul Wood that expressed his concern regarding the City <br />‘taking’ his property to connect the CTC Boulevard from Boxelder to Cherry. <br /> <br />Joel Self, 10145 Dill Rd, Broomfield, CO stated that he is a neighbor to the area to be developed <br />and came this evening to discuss with the Commission his concerns. He shared that his property <br />had been rezoned by the Northwest Parkway to Rural Preservation and it is his desire to maintain <br />that character. With that in mind he asked that the Planning Commission require a buffer between <br />his home and Lots 1 and 2 of at least 70 feet. <br /> <br />Lipton requesting information from Wood regarding what is required in the IDDSG. <br />Wood replied that the IDDSG has a 25-foot setback from the property line. <br /> <br />Lipton advised Self to keep an eye on the property development. He also stated that he knew that <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />