Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Approved – September 18, 2003 <br />He discussed the difficulty that customers have in locating Colony Square because of the lack of <br />signs. He briefly summarized the sign notes that had been detailed by Johnstone during the Staff <br />presentation. <br /> <br />Commission Questions: <br />Robson requested additional information / justification for the need of signage on the Colony <br />Square Tower. <br />Wildberger stated that the property manager is marketing the location with the use of the ‘Colony <br />Square’ logo and is encouraging all the tenants to do the same. <br /> <br />Pritchard: none <br /> <br />McAvinew: none <br /> <br />Lipton requested clarification that the center is not asking for anything not in the CDDSG. <br />Johnstone replied that they are not. He noted that in some ways the request is still more <br />restrictive then the CDDSG. <br /> <br />Kalish: none <br /> <br />McDermott: none <br /> <br />Members of the Public: <br />Lipton requested if anyone in the audience came to say anything either in support of or against the <br />request. None heard. <br /> <br />Staff Summary and Recommendation: <br />Staff provided no additional information. <br /> <br />Applicant Summary: <br />Applicant provided no additional information. <br /> <br />Public Hearing Closed Commission Comments: <br />Lipton closed the public hearing and requested Commission comments. <br /> <br />Robson supports the request. <br /> <br />Pritchard stated that he would vote against the proposal to be consistent with other similar <br />proposals. <br /> <br />McAvinew favors the proposal and would like to see the Commissioners and Planning Staff <br />address the need for possible changes to the CDDSG signage requirements. <br /> <br />Lipton favors the proposal, also wants to revisit the CDDSG signage requirements. <br /> <br /> <br />12 <br /> <br />