Laserfiche WebLink
Mayer agreed. Seconder, Howard, agreed. <br />Motion passed by a 7 - 0 vote. <br /> <br />Roll call was taken. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />ORDINANCE NO. 1111, SERIES 1993 - ZONING CERTAIN REAL <br />PROPERTY - STELMACH - 1ST READING - SET PUBLIC HEARING <br />7/20/93 <br /> <br />Griffiths read by title only Ordinance No 1111, Series 1993, <br /> · "An <br />ordinance zoning property annexed to the City of Louisville, known <br />as the Stelmach annexation." <br /> <br />Sisk: <br /> <br />If we zoned this CB, my reading of <br />the zoning is that the gasoline <br />service stations can be there, not <br />as a matter of right, but there is <br />an "R" there. What I am proposing <br />as part of this zoning is that we <br />eliminate the fact that gasoline <br />service stations are part of the CB <br />zoning. <br /> <br />Susan Griffiths, City Attorney, stated that the "R" stands for <br />special review. It would be permitted only by special review. She <br />stated that if Council wished to address this issue, perhaps it <br />could be done in the annexation agreement to eliminate that from <br />the uses in the district. <br /> <br />Sisk wondered if it could be made part of the annexation agreement <br />that there would be deletion of certain uses. <br /> <br />Griffiths: <br /> <br />Bresnehan: <br /> <br />Sisk: <br /> <br />You certainly can. You would need <br />the consent of the property owner. <br /> <br />You mentioned the convenience <br />center. I would like to make that a <br />matter of PUD. We're not going to <br />do a parking garage though. <br /> <br />My suggestion is that with Susan's <br />suggestion that we look and see the <br />uses very carefully, that any <br />annexation that we would have as <br />itemized and Council would <br />understand exactly what the uses <br />could be, as a matter of right. <br /> <br />Bresnehan <br /> <br />We have no problem .... I know <br />there's like 20 items in there, of <br />which some are highly unlikely and <br />we're not intending. I don't have a <br />problem with moving to the <br />annexation agreement on those items. <br /> <br />11 <br /> <br /> <br />