Laserfiche WebLink
"walkout.', As I remember, your <br />engineer either suggested or agreed <br />to that. <br /> <br />Sheffield: <br /> <br />That's correct. <br /> <br />Davidson: <br /> <br />So, even though the city forgot to <br />put all this down on the paperwork, <br />like they really should have, you <br />guys also knew about it too. So, <br />it's kind of a mutual mistake here. <br /> <br />Sheffield: <br /> <br />That's right. A mutual oversight. <br /> <br />Davidson: <br /> <br />As you are proposing these trees, <br />are you proposing them only on these <br />two particular lots? <br /> <br />Sheffield: <br /> <br />I think I suggested four to six <br />trees (total) along the four lots <br />that back to McCaslin, 12' <br />evergreens, staggered. <br /> <br />Hedding stated that he had favored four lots not having "walkouts," <br />but it came down to these two lots. He felt that it was <br />unfortunate that the trees would have to be on the property of the <br />individuals buying these homes, because from the drawings he felt <br />that it looked like they step out their door to Sherwood Forest. <br />He explained that he would put those trees either as close to the <br />fence, single file, and as many as possible, or on the other side <br />of the fence, up against the fence, as many as possible, and as <br />tall as possible. He didn't see how six trees across those two <br />lots was going to negate the view from the street. He felt more <br />trees were needed for that, up and down behind all four of the <br />homes. He stated that that was the original intent, not to have <br />the homes sticking up like skyscrapers. <br /> <br />Sisk stated that all of this was talked about with Mr. Sheffield. <br />He stated that he trusted Mr. Sheffield, when he and his engineer <br />were at the former meeting, when Sheffield stated that they will <br />not have "walkout" units. He wanted to see a fully developed <br />landscape plan and meet with the Enclave people to see if it <br />mitigates the situation. He was not excusing the city's part in <br />this, because it was a mutual mistake. <br /> <br />Mayer was angry, because Mr. Sheffield was at the meeting when this <br />was agreed to and not two innocent property buyers were involved. <br />He felt that Mr. Sheffield blatantly violated the agreement. <br /> <br />Sheffield: <br /> <br />When people make mistakes, at least <br />I'm man enough to admit it. I <br />called Mr. Sisk and apologized. I <br /> <br />14 <br /> <br /> <br />