My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Building Code Board of Appeals Minutes 2008 04 17
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
BUILDING CODE BOARD OF APPEALS
>
2000-2019 Building Code Board of Appeals Agendas and Packets
>
2008 Building Code Board of Appeals Agendas and Packets
>
Building Code Board of Appeals Minutes 2008 04 17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2021 2:00:22 PM
Creation date
6/3/2008 1:09:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
Supplemental fields
Test
BCBOAMIN 2008 04 17
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Building Code Board of Appeals <br />Minutes <br />March 20, 2008 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />Adam Stenftenagel: Recommended the Austin concept. The city of Austin, TX, <br />started their program as totally voluntary. They hired 10 full time staff to be <br />Green Building Consultants. They gave free consultations to homeowners, <br />contractors, and developers. By educating these builders with an infrastructure <br />of knowledge, they were then able to make the program mandatory 2 years later. <br />Adam Stenftenagel also suggested a program called Re-Green and 80 page <br />document regarding remodeling residential guidelines. See www.Re-green.org <br />Mike Jones said at the last LRCAB meeting that Jim Logan suggested that the <br />City of Longmont green points program does not work (has lower standards than <br />the code) and they are throwing their program out. Boulder can't agree on how <br />to implement their program and are reevaluating it at this time. <br />Bill Eckert agreed that in his experience there are a lot of disconnects with in the <br />different departments of the City of Boulder. He said the initial quote from <br />Boulder regarding the cost of the HERS program would be 1 % of the project. <br />However he said the true cost is more than that. <br />Adam Stenftenagel said the City of Boulder is suggesting it is more like 1-5% of <br />total cost. <br />Bill Eckert said the cost is $1,500 - $2,000 /house after modeling is done. There <br />is some chance for federal tax credits currently and also could save $450 a yr is <br />energy costs. <br />Adam Stenftenagel spoke about the Berkeley model which would help <br />homeowners finance energy upgrades with low interest rates (bonds backed by <br />cities) and the pay back would be added to the property taxes. So in effect this <br />cost would be passed on to the next homeowner. <br />Matt Berry said "we shouldn't mess with it. We should stick with market driven <br />solutions." <br />Bill Eckert questioned how the City of Louisville was going to implement this <br />program. <br />Mike Jones -said that we currently do not have anything in the budget. <br />Bill Eckert suggested that the city council allow the building department to <br />discount permit fees as an incentive to such a program. <br />Mike Jones - I am more concerned about the commercial side of this than <br />residential. I received today the commercial version of the City of Boulder plan <br />from Jim Logan (Architect and Consultant). I haven't had time yet to digest it. <br />Bill Eckert -suggested that if you are looking to reduce carbon footprint you <br />should be more concerned about energy efficiency rather than green points. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.