Laserfiche WebLink
Carnival expressed similar concerns and asked why <br />going on line in ].991 would hinder Superior's <br />efforts in applying for the CDBG funds. "We have <br />an agreement with you. You know the particulars <br />of that agreement. Can't you proceed with that?" <br />Ms. Belston repliesd stating that Superior is <br />proceeding with tYie grant application and if <br />approved the transmission and system and <br />transmission line would probably be completed in <br />1988. However, if` one of the conditions of <br />attaching to Louisville is that the Howard Berry <br />Treatment Plant be' on line, and if that isn't <br />going to happen until 1991, Superior would not be <br />able to accept the' State's money at this. <br />Anderson asked what Superior's interpretation of <br />the 1982 Agreement: was. <br />Ms. Belston stated. that it was their interpreta- <br />tion that all Superior would need to do is attach <br />to the 18" line already stubbed in at Dillon and <br />McCaslin and run the line south, bore under the <br />highway and set up a distribution system in <br />Superior. Ms. Belston stated that no mention has <br />been made that Superior would have to wait until <br />the new plant was on line. <br />Hundley stated that the original Agreement <br />clearly reference:o water treatment facilities at <br />the approximate location of the Howard Berry <br />plant. Hundley dial indicate that he would be <br />happy to present i~his issue to Council. In dis- <br />cussions between Hundley and Ms. Belston and <br />Superior Board Members, alternatives were dis- <br />cussed that Superior felt were needed from the <br />City of Louisville. Hundley, stated that before <br />taking any proposals to Council, Superior should <br />have something specifically in writing. However, <br />in Hundley's opinion, many things have changed <br />since that time, i.e., the Rock Creek Ranch has <br />been annexed to Superior and the proposed <br />amendments are a substantial departure from <br />requests of six or seven changes discussed pre- <br />vious to the Rock Creek annexation. <br />Mayor Fauson stated that he was on Council during <br />the drafting of the original Agreement and that <br />Council made it very clear that Louisville should <br />not be in the business of selling water. But <br />10 <br />