Laserfiche WebLink
Belston stated that the letter from Hundley to <br />Mayor Asti prompted Superior to look into CDBG <br />funds and that an application has been submitted <br />for $500,000 with committee hearings on March 18. <br />Given the fact that Superior has now made applica- <br />tion and an engineer is pursuing preliminary eng~z~.eei <br />i~g to attach to the Louisville water system, <br />Belston stated that the Town Board felt it was <br />time to submit any changes to Louisville. <br />Anderson asked hoer grant monies and the proposed <br />amendment to the Agreement are tied together. <br />Belston stated the: Board will be meeting the next <br />night to discuss provisions addressed in the <br />original Agreementt i.e., limitations on population <br />growth and other things that some members of the <br />Board "feel that i:hey can't live with." Belston <br />further stated that it was somewhat of a surprise <br />to read in today's newspaper that water to <br />Superior would not be available until 1991. "If <br />that is the case, we certainly have to pull back <br />our grant application." "If our 1982 Water <br />Service Agreement is still in force, what would be <br />earliest year that we (Superior) could hope to <br />attach to the Louisville system." <br />Anderson asked if Ms. Belston questioned whether <br />the Agreement was in force. Ms. Belston responded <br />that she was assured by Hundley that it-was. <br />Sackett stated that he felt uncomfortable with <br />negotiating tonight on the proposed amended <br />_agreement. Although it may be proper for Superior <br />to make such a proposal, negotiating tonight would <br />not be the time. However, if there is anyway to <br />work with the Town of Superior without <br />jeopardizing the future of Louisville, then <br />Council may want to look at this as a first step <br />in that procedure„ There is a lot of work that <br />would have to be clone in order to begin that <br />process. <br />Szymanski stated that the proposed amended agree- <br />ment is clearly unacceptable to Louisville. He <br />would encourage staff discussion in the future and <br />come up with something that may be agreeable to <br />both sides. However, this proposal is not the <br />starting point at all. Szymanski stated that he <br />would like to know what Superior's motive and long <br />term goal is with. regard to this agreement. "They <br />want us to supply all of Rock Creek Ranch with <br />water. I think that is the ultimate motive and I <br />don't think that':a at all in Louisville's best <br />interest. <br />9 <br />