My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1986 06 16
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1986 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1986 06 16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:26 PM
Creation date
7/15/2008 11:03:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
6/16/1986
Original Hardcopy Storage
2E2
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1986 06 16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
isn't "hard and fast", however the more hydrants <br />available .in an area allows fire equipment to come <br />closer to the structure itself. There are also <br />other alternatives such as sprinkling a building. <br />Dave Stahl, Homart Development Co., 400 So. <br />McCaslin Blvd., asked who has the ultimate <br />authority and responsibility in the interpretation <br />of the Fire Code as it relates to the Municipal <br />Ordinances and if it is clear in the adoption of <br />this Ordinance. <br />Rautenstraus stated that it is not addressed in <br />this particular Ordinance. This Ordinance is <br />enforced as an Ordinance of the City if adopted. <br />Stahl asked who specifically would be responsible <br />and who would have the ultimate authority to <br />require placement, size, etc. of water utilities <br />in subdivision developments. <br />Rautenstraus stated that ultimately it would <br />become the decision of the City. <br />Dhieux feels the Fire District still has some <br />jurisdiction over these decisions and feels that <br />the District and the City have a good working <br />relationship to come to ultimate conclusions. <br />Stahl stated concern over the clear line of <br />authority and if this is specifically addressed <br />within this Ordinance. <br />Rautenstraus stated that because this is a <br />municipal Ordinance, it is the City's <br />responsibility to enforce it. However, Homart's <br />property is within the Louisville Fire District <br />which is an entity unto itself and therefore would <br />also be responsible to that authority. <br />Dhieux stated that there are provisions within the <br />Colorado Revised Statutes where the Fire District <br />still has some jurisdiction over some codes to be <br />enforced within municipalities. <br />Hundley stated that the City accepts the <br />responsibility of ultimate enforcement of this or <br />any ordinance. Hundley suggested that if Council <br />so desired, he and Rautenstraus would continue to <br />review this question to see if there is any way to <br />make it clearer with regard to lines of authority. <br />In response to a question by Sackett regarding <br />maintenance of fire hydrants, Phare explained that <br />the Fire District routinely maintains them and <br />from time to time the City has also performed this <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.