My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 2017 04 03 SP
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
2010-2019 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
2017 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 2017 04 03 SP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:12:26 PM
Creation date
4/11/2017 11:57:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Original Hardcopy Storage
7B4
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 2017 04 03 SP
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The Former Sam's_Club Site <br />As this property enters its eighth year of vacancy, it's apparent we must <br />begin to explore options for a"Plan B". It is obvious that the current owner <br />is highly reluctant to bear the financial risk of litigation over the issues of <br />condemning the covenants. And, the City is not willing to bear the costs of <br />litigation either. <br />It's time to face reality and begin discussions of what to do next. The <br />property is vacant, unproductive and a blight in the heart of what should be <br />a vibrant part of the City. There will be no easy solutions, but we need to <br />explore additional options. Now. <br />The Conoco -Phillips Site <br />Nothing will happen here unless the City takes steps to remove obstacles <br />to its sale and redevelopment. 1 do not favor creating a residential <br />neighborhood on the property. 1 do believe the City needs to develop a plan <br />to bring infrastructure and utilities to the site; rezone to allow five -story <br />buildings on the site; and do these proactively in order to create a <br />marketable property. <br />We should consider how to create an expedited review process for any <br />new deveropment. Whether it is form -based zoning for this site, or some <br />other concept, the time it currently takes to proceed through our <br />development review is an obstacle to redevelopment. We need to decide <br />what we want here and create zoningg and processes to achieve it. <br />Historic Downtown <br />Contrary to the popular rnythos, Downtown continues to struggle. One <br />major obstacle is the lack of easily available parking. The new BRaD, in <br />conjunction with the 'SRC and City Council, should work to develop a <br />structured parking plan that encourages continued investment and <br />redevelopment Downtown. One goal should be to increase the daytime <br />population downtown bycreating more office space...and therefore <br />daytime workers. <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.