City Council Minutes 2017 07 05 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

City Council Meeting Minutes July 5, 2017 Page 4 of 18 Council member Maloney stated he was willing to move forward with some minor changes to the RFP. He felt professionals should be doing the moving Mr Leary didn't want to delay but wondered if the bid could be broken into sections He felt the actual moving of the structures should be done by professionals. Mayor Muckle moved to approve the request for proposals for moving and rehabilitation of the miner's cabins with direction to staff to include volunteers as part of the scope of work where appropriate and ask for itemized responses for moving cost versus restoration cost. Council member Keany seconded with a minor alteration that the volunteers be an add alternate instead of a required part of the RFP since it could actually add cost for a contractor in terms of supervision of those volunteers Mayor Muckle agreed Roll Call Vote. Muckle — yes, Maloney — yes, Stolzmann — yes, Loo — yes, Keany'— yes, Lipton — yes,`Leh — yes. 185 & 197 SOUTH 104th STREET — EASEMENT VACATION AND FINAL PLAT & PUD ORDINANCE NO. 1741, SERIES 2017 — AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE VACATION OF A 20 -FOOT WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT AND A PORTION OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT ON LOTS 2A AND 3A, THE BUSINESS CENTER AT CTC REPLAT F — 2nd READING — PUBLIC HEARING (advertised Daily Camera 06/11/17) RESOLUTION NO. 30, SERIES 2017 — A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL PLAT AND AN AMENDMENT TO THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) TO CONSTRUCT A 6,267 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION AND A 1,410 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION TO CONNECT TWO EXISTING BUILDINGS — continued from 06/06/17 Mayor Muckle requested a City Attorney introduction City Attorney Light introduced Ordinance No 1741, Series 2017 and Resolution No 30, Senes 2017 and noted the staff would present on both items Mayor Muckle opened the public hearing and called for a staff presentation Associate Planner Ritchie noted the subject property is located in the northeast area of the CTC. The property is zoned Planned Community Zone District — Industrial, and is required to comply with the Industrial Development Design Standards and Guidelines (IDDSG). Council saw parts of this application in 2016 which was the proposed freezer at the rear of the building Since that time, the applicant determined connecting the two existing buildings would be in their best interest, therefore necessitating a re -plat to remove the lot line dividing the two properties and vacating two existing easements