City Council Minutes 1984 04 19 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

4/19/84 Page -2- Mayor Meier questioned what prompted the ordinance. Administrator Wurl advised two recent inci- dents in conjunction with other problems and because we didn't have an ordinance there wasn't anything our Judge could do aboLZt it or charge them with. Vote on the Motion Rol7L call vote: Cussen Yes Johnson Yes Woodson Yes Morris Yes Duce Yes Meier Yes Motion carried unanimously - 6-0. ANNEXATION POLICY - REPORT Attorney Rautenstraus stated that staff was directed to begin working on a way of implementing an annexation policy. It was his suggestion that this be done in the form of a resolution to be prepared for the next meeting that specifies the policy. In doing so staff wished to go through the areas that would be placed in the resolution to see if those were what Council desired before it wa:~ prepared. It was his understanding that the principle behind the resolution would be to suggest that we need to limit the types of annexations to be reviewed right now so that we can be certain tharoservmanner.beBut provided or kept up in a p p the points to be considered whether an annex- ation would be reviewed or not - 1) the property would need to be in the Urbalaneorice Area - 2) some type o~ode~~loWasn~o be plan showing how the p p Y developed would need to be included. 3) annexations which would not be limited would be: city owned property, open space and com- mercial/industrial property. He believed tYiat there was a suggestion that the size of tYie parcel be limited to some extent. His understanding was that a principle was to try to limit annexations to situations where there would be no more than one dwelling unit involved. If that was the case then that would automatically limit the size to 5 acres. It was also his understanding that there was a suggestion on the limitation on the number of dwelling units. Finally the