My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 2018 10 02
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
2018 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 2018 10 02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/19/2022 3:14:35 PM
Creation date
10/17/2018 10:35:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Original Hardcopy Storage
9C1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 2018 10 02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
City Council <br />Meeting Minutes <br />October 2, 2018 <br />Page 8 of 15 <br />new technology comes we aren't fighting over the poles. She stated her preference for <br />allowing higher poles like Broomfield. Mayor Muckle agreed. <br />Sherry Sommer, 910 South Palisade Court, asked what the density of poles will be. <br />Ken Fellman, Kissinger and Fellman, City consultant, stated existing State and Federal <br />rules allow each network to decide how dense their facilities will be. Some <br />neighborhoods might be more impacted, but it is up to the private sector. <br />He stated the FCC recently amended their rules and they impact cities heavily and a <br />court challenge is expected. It includes language stating a local impediment to service is <br />a violation of Federal law which can include pole height limitations and application fees. <br />He stated his advice for his clients is not to make code changes to address this order <br />until we know what the final rules will be as we have good legal standing until this is <br />resolved. <br />Fellman stated that related to the Comcast email, State law states communities may <br />continue to require permits for micro facilities because the type of work needed for <br />installation (closing traffic to access a site, working in the right-of-way) requires a permit. <br />He feels the current practices and rules are acceptable under State law and no <br />exception is required. <br />Mayor Muckle closed the public hearing. <br />Councilmember Maloney asked the City Attorney if we should continue the item to <br />address the comments from Comcast. City Attorney Kelly stated that on this matter she <br />would defer to Mr. Fellman for legal advice as he is the expert in this field. <br />Mayor Pro Tem Lipton asked staff if we should we wait until we have final information <br />on the FCC rules. Ritchie stated this ordinance is also required to meet current State <br />law related to small cell facilities. If the FCC rules are more restrictive in the end we can <br />address that. Fellman stated many companies don't want to wait and they do have a <br />use by right to install these facilities under State law, so it is important to get some rules <br />in place so we have design rules to protect us. <br />Councilmember Loo stated we need to be prepared for 5G so we aren't behind; we <br />should get it right the first time. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann moved to approve Ordinance 1763, Series 2018; Mayor <br />Muckle seconded the motion. <br />Councilmember Stolzmann stated we need to update the code to bring it into regulatory <br />compliance with the existing Federal and State rules. She asked staff to continue to look <br />at the regulations to determine if changes are needed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.