My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1983 04 05
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1983 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1983 04 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:21 PM
Creation date
7/7/2009 4:30:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
4/5/1983
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1983 04 05
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Councilman Leary <br /> <br />Richard Luce, 197 Harper St. <br /> <br />r0uncilman Cussen <br /> <br />Roll Call Vote on the Motion <br /> <br />DEFEATED <br /> <br />Study Session <br /> <br />Councilman Leary <br /> <br />Page -10- <br /> <br />Responded to Mr. Drumm and stated there <br />had been 2 study sessions on this topic. <br />Possibly 15-25 people had attended. The <br />study sessions were scheduled at the last <br />Council meeting for the purpose of resolving <br />the issues. Also stated there is not a <br />business man in this community that would <br />make decisions based on the kind of infor- <br />mation Council has presently, and if he did <br />would be out of business. Council does not <br />have information critical to the future of <br />the City to make decisions before these 5 <br />issues are resolved. <br /> <br />Thanked Mayor Meier for recognizin6 him <br />even though this was not a public hearing, <br />and commented he felt obligated to speak. <br />To be brief and very succint, he personally <br />found it a bit objectionable and highly <br />inappropriate that someone that represents <br />a developer would tell Council what is or <br />is not appropriate. <br /> <br />Stated the motion on the floor was to deal <br />with whether or not to vote on the 5 concerns. <br />Felt that it was imperative Council give <br />direction to the Planning Commission. Was <br />very concerned with the fiscal plan for <br />providing water and sewer services. Was <br />not in favor of processing any more annexations <br />until all the issues were resolved. <br /> <br />Morris <br />Meier <br />Leary <br />Cummings <br />Ferrera <br />Cussen <br />Fauson <br />Motion defeated <br /> <br />Yes <br />No <br />Yes <br />No <br />No <br />Yes <br />No. <br />4-3. <br /> <br />Councilman Cummings moved that an initial <br />meeting be set for April 6th to include <br />Planning Commission, Staff and Council to <br />address the 5 issues in Councilman Leary's <br />motion for direction or concern. After <br />that a public hearing be set. <br /> <br />Commented before the issues could be dis- <br />cussed the information should be available <br />a week in advance so that he would have time <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.