Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Dennis Drumm, Associated <br />Land Consultants - Representing <br />Gary Krantz <br /> <br />Councilman Leary <br /> <br />Councilwoman Morris <br /> <br />Refer to Planning Commission <br /> <br />Councilman Cussen <br /> <br />Table the Request <br /> <br />ouncilman Cummings <br /> <br />3/1/83 <br /> <br />Page -8- <br /> <br />Mr. Drumm advised that the property had <br />been on the market for sometime. It was <br />his understanding that Mr. Krantz wished <br />to work with the City to accomplish their <br />goals. <br /> <br />Inquired what the zoning was on the property. <br />Director Rupp advised it was in our Planning <br />Area but no zoning designation had been <br />given. <br />Administrator Wurl stated that when the <br />City permitted the development of the lots <br />owned by the County, the City provided for <br />access to that property in terms of a <br />dedicated roadway on the west end of Paragon <br />Heights. This was his reason for being <br />evasive about the zoning for the acreage <br />at the top of the hill. Commented there <br />maybe the possibility of obtaining from <br />the developer a portion of the property <br />free of charge for the City. Also advised <br />that the zoning designation would be made <br />before the Planning Commission held the <br />public hearing; as it needs to be advertised. <br /> <br />Commented someone that had gone to see <br />some of the lots that were available was <br />told that somewhere in the estate, a dedi- <br />cation had already been made to the City <br />of some greenbelt area. <br />Mr. Drumm advised only to the extent that <br />the City owns that portion of the 80 acres <br />that now houses the reservoir. <br /> <br />Councilman Fauson moved, Councilman Cummings <br />seconded that the Steinbach request for <br />annexation be referred to the Planning Com- <br />mission for review and recommendation. <br /> <br />Commented he too felt it was premature to <br />refer this matter to the Planning Commission <br />and favored tabling the request at this time. <br /> <br />Councilman Leary moved, Councilwoman Morris <br />seconded that the request for annexation <br />be tabled until the April 5th council meeting <br />after some of the issues of concern have <br />been resolved. <br /> <br />Commented he felt that the concerns expressed <br />should be dealt with by the Planning Commis- <br />sion, and sincerely felt council could bene- <br />fit from their review as they are aware of <br />