My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Minutes 1981 12 15
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
MINUTES (45.090)
>
1970-1999 City Council Minutes
>
1981 City Council Minutes
>
City Council Minutes 1981 12 15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 2:31:19 PM
Creation date
7/14/2009 2:26:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Minutes
Signed Date
12/15/1981
Original Hardcopy Storage
7C3
Supplemental fields
Test
CCMIN 1981 12 15
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />12/15/81 <br /> <br />Page -4- <br /> <br />cia1 zoning he was requesting would be a <br />benefit to the City of Louisville. <br /> <br />COUNCIL REMARKS <br />COUNCILMAN CUNHINGS <br /> <br />Advised he would like to make a statement <br />in support of Mr. Bie11a by reminding Council <br />re: the Superior Interchange, the 1500' <br />setback, the Comp Plan - a Comp Plan that <br />Council agreed to amend because it wasn't <br />viable; and it was his opionion that Mr. <br />Bie11a should not be put in the middle of <br />various negotiations as it did not have <br />anything to do with this annexation. He <br />referred to section 16 - 32.22 of the <br />l1unicipa1 Code states is to only consider <br />if the petition meets the requirements <br />of the law. It was his opinion this should <br />be the main concern of council and not be <br />influenced by talk of set-back, shopping <br />center, or interchange. <br /> <br />COUNCILMAN MEIER <br /> <br />Remarked the annexation was not in the <br />city's urban service area at this time, <br />and this is in the process of being amended <br />by DRCOG at the present time and the vote <br />will be taken on this December 16, 1981 <br />at their meeting. It was his opinion until <br />the comp plan can be amended issues would <br />have to be dealt with according to the <br />present plan. He reminded Council of the <br />Zurick annexation request that had been <br />held up for sometime because the City felt <br />there was an abundance of commercial zoning <br />in the area and an office zoning was created. <br />It was his opinion that the situation has <br />not changed for the need for additional com- <br />mercial zoning. <br />Councilman Heier inquired of Attorney <br />Rautenstraus if the occasion arose where <br />we had gone against the comp plan as being <br />open space would this jeopardize our position <br />in the future. <br />Attorney Rautenstraus advised it would depend <br />on the individual case; however it is to the <br />City's benefit if they have stuck with the <br />comp plan if they are consistent - it may <br />be different if they are not consistent. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.