My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Recreation Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2022 06 27
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD
>
2022 Recreation Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
Recreation Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2022 06 27
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/7/2022 2:49:35 PM
Creation date
7/7/2022 2:38:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
6/27/2022
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Recreation Advisory Board <br />Minutes <br />May 23, 2022 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />White Construction provided a preliminary cost study, but an actual <br />estimate would require a detailed design. The following costs were listed <br />in the agenda and include a 10% contingency. In our current economy it's <br />difficult to gauge the percentage increase from year to year. <br />o $18,602,000 for the clubhouse facilities <br />o $2,643,000 for the maintenance facility <br />o $936,000 for the teaching pavilion <br />Richard S. acknowledged that this is a significant project. If improvements <br />are made, net income will rise, with increases in rounds, green fees, and <br />range sales; and in part from the teaching pavilion and other non -golf <br />operations. Changes in the agreement with the food vendor could <br />increase net income. However, potential added income will not pay for the <br />cost of the the improvements. If the golf course stays as it is, the <br />consultants predict shrinking net income, followed by losses. Expenses <br />will rise and the golf course will not be locally competitive. <br />Gene Kutscher suggested that the new clubhouse could be promoted as a <br />venue to bring the community together. Looking at the cost on a per capita <br />basis might help to put the price in perspective. <br />Dick Friedson would like information regarding what would be on each level of <br />the clubhouse and how the space would be configured. He asked the <br />consultants to find recently constructed benchmark facilities that could be <br />used to justify the cost estimates, as the cost per square foot seems high. <br />The cost of a similar building, with an adjustment for current increases, would <br />provide important verification. Dick suggested getting another cost opinion <br />with a professional estimator. When moving forward, the Board needs to have <br />numbers that can be justified. <br />In discussion, RAB members expressed agreement that the clubhouse is at <br />the end of its useful life and that it needs to be replaced. The current building <br />is deficient both environmentally and functionally. Board members talked <br />about the desirability of a new building that would support the sustainability <br />and energy efficiency goals of the community. Board members had different <br />ideas about the ideal size and function of the dining areas, particularly related <br />to the use of the building for large banquet events and fine dining. <br />At our June meeting RAB members plan to review the Golf Course Strategic <br />Plan and our mission/vision statement. Board members look forward to <br />sharing all of this information with the new Parks, Recreation and Open <br />Space Director. <br />The consultants reported that the "Financial Feasibility Study for Facility <br />Improvements at Coal Creek Golf Course" should be finished in a few weeks. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.