My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Open Space Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2022 11 09
PORTAL
>
BOARDS COMMISSIONS COMMITTEES RECORDS (20.000)
>
OPEN SPACE ADVISORY BOARD
>
2022 Open Space Advisory Board Agendas and Packets
>
Open Space Advisory Board Agenda and Packet 2022 11 09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2022 5:20:04 PM
Creation date
11/15/2022 11:52:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Meeting Date
11/9/2022
Doc Type
Boards Commissions Committees Records
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Open Space Advisory Board <br />Minutes <br />October 12, 2022 <br />Page 7 of 8 <br />Ember said that considering trails in a one-off fashion is hard for staff to do, because <br />they hear a lot of varying community input (on both sides) and it is hard to get an <br />accurate sense of the public's priority. She said it is helpful to have a master plan or a <br />regular public process. <br />David asked what sort of process Council is in favor of. Ember said she thought the <br />TMP is probably the best record of what council has signed off on and a new process <br />should be considered for new trail concerns. David pointed out that the TMP is mostly <br />on -street connections. <br />Ember thinks the best approach is to consider the network, to identify the trails that best <br />serve the network, then to evaluate each trail as part of that network, deciding at that <br />time if they should be concrete, crusher fines, or dirt trails. <br />David mentioned that Lafayette is closing off social trails that are between the Coal <br />Creek Trail and the creek. He noted that they seem to be doing this process by focusing <br />on one particular region intensely. <br />Charles wants to address how the board should handle trail requests that suddenly <br />come up, like a recent proposal to re-route a connection at Hecla Lake to follow a <br />current social trail. Laura pointed out that she wants to be sure that people get treated <br />equally and the board doesn't simply favor whoever is most insistent. <br />Laura suggested the board develop a values checklist to guide future discussions of <br />one-off connections, formalization proposals, and proposed social trails closure. It could <br />include things like "what is the ecological impact?" "how does this serve the connectivity <br />of the greater network?" "how cost effective is this proposal?" etc. Charles said he'd like <br />to consider this idea. <br />David said he'd like input from people like Alan Gill and staff. He thinks there are so <br />many maps to check (PROST, TMP, wayfinding etc.) for any trail proposal, that it makes <br />these sorts of evaluations difficult. <br />11. Discussion Item: Draft 2023 City Council Workplan Recommendations. <br />Presented by Ember Brignull, Open Space Superintendent and David Blankinship, <br />OSAB Chair <br />The City Manager is asking boards and commissions to provide feedback and input onto <br />the City Council's 2023 workplan. <br />Susan asked about the open space zoning project on the 2022 Council workplan. <br />Ember gave her some background about this, telling her that all the easy properties (with <br />defined parcel lines) have already been zoned. The remaining work will require a survey <br />company to assist with creating new property lines and drafting legal descriptions. David <br />commented that he thinks this isn't a particularly high priority, as the land is protected <br />even without full zoning. <br />M <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.