My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1997 08 05
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1990-1999 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1997 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1997 08 05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:23:37 PM
Creation date
12/4/2009 9:24:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
8/5/1997
Original Hardcopy Storage
5A1
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1997 08 05
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
302
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Davidson called for the applicant's presentation. <br />Lou Dellacava, Erik Hartronft's partner in the project, spoke of the faith they had in Downtown <br />Louisville. <br />Hartronft pointed out that the esthetics of the building would remain essentially them same with the <br />addition of the dormers and the historic State Mercantile signage. There are five parking spaces in <br />essentially the same orientation that they are today to the curb cut on Spruce Street, with three spaces <br />off of the alley. It was their intent that the alley spaces would be reserved for building tenants, most <br />likely the office tenants and that the spaces facing Spruce Street would be for the retail tenants on the <br />first floor. They will be donating two street trees for Spruce with a bench. <br />Davidson called for Council comments. <br />Mayer was concerned about the (lack of) parking issue. He stated that the City had spent a lot of <br />money on parking lots. He felt that redevelopment and new development should take up the slack. <br />Sisk was concerned about the lighting. He preferred the eight parking spots with a mix of a little,' <br />streetscaping to break up the entry. <br />Keany felt the metal chimney detracted from the character of the building and recommended its <br />deletion. He did not want the signs to be garish. <br />Levihn liked the project. <br />Lathrop liked the project, but pointed out that an office /retail mix would dictate about 30 parking <br />spaces and they are providing just eight. He wanted to know what they planned on doing. <br />Hartronft did not feel the parking problem could be addressed on a site -by -site basis. He suggested <br />a downtown parking structure would be a good investment for the City. He pointed out that if there <br />were parking downtown, retailers would be attracted to the downtown area. <br />Davidson stated that the City had not spent a dime on McCaslin. It had all been paid for by the <br />developers. They even paid $5 million toward the interchange out there. All if the money the City <br />had spent to keep business alive and vibrant had been spent downtown. He stated that the City would <br />probably look for some kind of shared funding for downtown parking. <br />Howard moved that Council approve Resolution No. 29, Series 1997, Final PUD Plan <br />801 Main Street, as amended, eliminating condition No. 3, with the additional amendment that the <br />signage go back to staff for final approval, seconded by Mayer. <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.