City Council Agenda and Packet 1982 01 05

Home Browse Search

410 410 • 12/15/81 Page -3- In conclusion Director Rupp advised staff's position is that the comprehensive plan has not been amended at this tree, •and circumstzucaz s-...-rouudiuu the Superior Interchange should be reviewed in view of the annexation. It is staff's posi- tion it is premature at this time to consider the annexation and zoning and the staff would not recommend approval at this time. Mayor Caranci asked if there was anyone supporting the application. None MITE CUSSEN Anyone opposed to the application. COUNCILMAN ELECT 1877 Garfield St. Stated he would like to share his cvncerna Louisville with Council that he felt the annexation would be in violation of the comp plan; and it was a p'.an that we should abide by or go through the amending procedure. He felt it was premature to approve the annexation before amending the plan. It was more important that we maintain the integrity and the credibility of the Comp Plan. Nu was also concerned that it would jeopardize negotiations with the State relative to the improvement of the Superior Interchange as well as the Centennial Valley Mall. For these reasons he would request denial at this time and reconsider the annexation under the amended comp plan pro- cedures. RICHARD BIELLA Advised Council that he was the sole owner 8184 Dillon Road of the property and it was his opinion that all members of council ha"' hnd an opportun- xty to review the annezat suzette*. Replying to the statement annexation jeopardizing the negotiations with the Superior Interchange and Centennial Valley Mall he did not know whether the annexation would or would not; however they had 5-5 months while he waited for his annexation. He did not feel this was the point. As for the Comp Plan, the position ha wished zoned commercial is adjacent to Dillon Rood and in the annexation agreement the land near Coal Creek will be open space. He also dedicated an easement to Superior for the sewer line. It was his opinion the comer-