My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1982 07 06
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1973-1989 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1982 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1982 07 06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:46:50 PM
Creation date
12/29/2009 12:01:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
7/6/1982
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1982 07 06
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
411 <br /> 6/15/82 Page -9- <br /> Mike Helmer Introduced himself to Council and expressed <br /> 1766 W. Chokecherry Drive his concern about the size of the office <br /> complex proposed to be constructed by Neodata. <br /> He felt a complex of this size didn't belong <br /> in residential subdivisions. Commented the <br /> people who approved of this complex saw it <br /> as clean industry with good tax revenues; <br /> but felt it should be located in the indus- <br /> trial area and requested Council not approve <br /> the subdivision plat as presented. It was <br /> also his feeling the complex did not meet <br /> spirit nor letter of the zoning regulations . <br /> Steve Yatchak Stated he lived in Continental View Estates <br /> 1091 Azure Way and thanked Council for the opportunity to <br /> speak. Commented that he was disappointed <br /> to see so few residents of the Mesa in at- <br /> tendance. He knew of 300 residents who were <br /> against the proposal; but felt they were <br /> not in attendance because they felt no one <br /> on Council would listen to their concerns. <br /> Mr. Yatchak expressed his concerns with <br /> the traffic, potential water problems , <br /> incompatibility of light industry - a <br /> monstrous office complex in a fine residential <br /> area. He questioned Council if there was any- <br /> thing that anyone could say that would delay <br /> the project. <br /> Dennis Knowlton Thanked Council for allowing him to speak <br /> 955 W. Plum and stated that he knew of two petitions being <br /> circulated against the Neodata proposal. <br /> Advised that several people in the neighboring <br /> areas were very much against the proposal <br /> and had stated their concerns at the Planning <br /> Commission meeting as well as the negotiating <br /> meetings with Neodata. He too felt that the <br /> proposed complex was too large and should be <br /> relocated in the CTC industrial area. It was <br /> his opinion the zoning was for small personal <br /> services, i.e . animal clinic, doctors , dentists, <br /> attorneys , etc. his grave concern was that <br /> Neodata is an international organization em- <br /> ploying approximately 300 people driving 300 <br /> cars . He felt there were 2 options available <br /> to Council pertinent to the proposal - review <br /> the zoning to be more restrictive, or delay <br /> their decision and ask the City Attorney to <br /> get an independent judge to rule on the zoning. <br /> Mr. Knowlton stated the Neodata purchase of <br /> the property was contingent upon the passing <br /> of the subdivision resolution; requested de- <br /> laying the action until another appraisal of <br /> the zoning was obtained. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.