My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
City Council Agenda and Packet 1992 10 20
PORTAL
>
CITY COUNCIL RECORDS
>
AGENDAS & PACKETS (45.010)
>
1990-1999 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
1992 City Council Agendas and Packets
>
City Council Agenda and Packet 1992 10 20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2021 1:47:04 PM
Creation date
1/15/2010 2:19:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Records
Doc Type
City Council Packet
Signed Date
10/20/1992
Supplemental fields
Test
CCAGPKT 1992 10 20
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
290
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• <br /> mulohsd. <br /> Lathrop! The folks that currently reside to <br /> the east of this proposed <br /> development would,. be assured that <br /> control measures ear the wind blown <br /> dust Could be put in place? <br /> Jorgensen: Yes, that's oorrect. <br /> Lathrop Would you consent on the soil <br /> conditions as far as subsidence, <br /> expanse of soils, and those kinds of <br /> prob hems? Do they exist an a to whet <br /> extent, if they do? <br /> Jorgensen: I haven't looked at the soil report <br /> in detail. I know that there has <br /> been a carries of soil reports done. <br /> In 1977, as • part of the <br /> annexation, a report was done by <br /> 7.114 Fox. I have reviewed that <br /> report. As far as I know, there is <br /> no subsidence problem within this <br /> area for residential construction. <br /> There are expansive soils and they <br /> will have to be accounted for within <br /> the design of the utilities, the <br /> roadways, and the residential. <br /> structures. They are not unusual <br /> soils to this area or any worse than <br /> what was encountered in some of the <br /> developments of Mcstain. <br /> Lathrop: With the addition of the decal lane <br /> on South loulder goad, how such <br /> distance is there from the edge of <br /> the decal lane to where there <br /> perimeter fence would be installed? <br /> Row such roam is there to <br /> accommodate that sidewalk? <br /> loxgen en: There's 7 ft. from the =_rh to the <br /> edge of the richt- of -way line, which <br /> would be • property lira. <br /> Lathrop: In that we would have to have the 5 <br /> ft. sidewalk? <br /> Jorgsvjen! That's correct. <br /> Redding! Are you aware of any under mining in <br /> 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.