Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> .., . <br /> committee and report back. <br /> Sackett: Felt the agreement should last through the <br /> completion of the parkway and the purchase of <br /> the land and no further. Also if further <br /> governments wish to add more grade separated <br /> interchanges, this agreement would not <br /> inhibit them from doing that. Also was <br /> concerned that the connection between 96th <br /> and 42 is included in the funding in the MTDC <br /> plan, would like to have that verified. 96th <br /> Street Interchange, would have been funded in <br /> large by Interlocken and the City of <br /> Broomfield. I want to make sure that they <br /> are still going to provide those funds <br /> outside the MTDC plan, because if that <br /> project is folded into this there wouldn't be <br /> enough money to fund our projects. <br /> Mayor Fauson: I believe the discussion that we had with Ron <br /> Stewart, I did ask the question if there <br /> would be any refunding or some of the work <br /> and he stated yes there would be. <br /> Hornbostel: That was not my understanding, but I will ask <br /> at the next meeting. <br /> Carnival: If I understand this memo we are to set a <br /> public hearing for February 5th. After the <br /> concerns that have been expressed by Council <br /> is February 5th the deadline to have this <br /> put together? <br /> Brand: No, the deadline for having all the entities <br /> in agreement is March 31st. Boulder County <br /> is pushing for the public hearings as soon as <br /> possible. There are some legal concerns that <br /> Susan Griffiths found. All of the Attorneys <br /> for each city will be getting together next <br /> week. There are a lot of unanswered <br /> questions. <br /> carnival: My concern is that we have collectively <br /> agreed to this compromise, but what I see now <br /> is a lot of new information that our attorney <br /> is not comfortable with and yet we are going <br /> to set this out for a public hearing. I <br /> would like to make it clear that just because <br /> we are putting this out for public hearing <br /> does not mean that we support what is here. <br /> I feel that we are sending something out that <br /> if the public said yes, I couldn't vote for <br /> based on what is in front of me. <br /> Hornbostel: Was uncomfortable with parts of the agreement <br /> 9 <br />